X is for Xerothermic, this is our planet's number one enemy, HOT DRY CLIMATES they are what happens when carbon dioxide becomes minimal!
This may seem to contradict what I have said caused the planet to enter into cyclical in-nature periods of ice ages, starting around 2.5 million years ago. However, it is just another example of how life can and has needed to adapt to changing atmospheric conditions. There are so many interconnections in how life, atmosphere, sun, humidity, ocean, and air currents, even plate tectonics play different roles, in how the planet adapts and life strives to exist! The "Plan" is designed to combat what has been transpiring as an end of "all carbon-based life on the planet", over 3 Billion years in the making! I can not stress enough, just how mathematically improbable is that mankind just happened to be on the scene at the right and necessary time in a timeline covering over 3 billion years. Yes, a case could be made that of that 3 billion years, the planet's atmosphere would have been deadly for much of that timeline, and advanced lifeforms as we know them could only exist for a much shorter period of time and thereby increasing the mathematical chances significantly yet still would be hard to entertain. Mankind does not get to pick and chose what cards we have been dealt, and so far we have done very poorly with the cards we have been given, by only taking what we feel we deserve, not by working to make a better planet! During mankind's lifetime on the planet, major changes in the conditions of both arid and semi-arid areas of the planet have become an overriding condition of extreme weather, Due in great part to temperature extremes over very short periods of time, over very large areas. The Sahara desert in North Africa, bring's extremely hot and cold sometimes 140 degrees during the day and down to 40 degrees at night a 100-degree variation, Antarctic desert, can go from -60 degrees to 30 degrees during the day a 90-degree variation. While in the tropical rainforest, during most 24-hour periods, there is seldom more than 20 degrees variation leading to quiet rains and high humidity. The "plans" objective is to create much less extreme temperature variations, by recreating what were the "normal" patterns, long before mankind ever existed, but to do that will require a massive workforce. Payment for work "with cash" will never succeed because what will happen with that land once it is replanted? Only by paying those who do the work, with ownership of that new income-producing land, will we start to see personal investments of time and labor necessary for advancing! As always I can be reached at 402-890-7946, or by G-mail at <daniel.kadavy212@gmail.com> to continue reading you can go to <https://lifecycleofaplanet.blogspot.com> Thank You, Dan Please kept telling others or if you have not done so yet, start!
Why with so much overwhelming evidence, of the changing atmosphere of the planet, combined with the relatively new information on the makeup of the atmosphere of the other 7 planets in our solar system, Why do we not put force the necessary work to try and understand how all of this is affecting our planet now? You can not go 24 hours and not see something about how bad mankind is in that they (WE) are ruining the planet. When the EXXON VALDEZ ran aground in Alaska losing millions of gallons of crude oil, everyone said that it would take as long as 200 years for the area to be the same as before! Yet the area is beautiful today with wildlife back in full force, yes there are still some ongoing issues but nothing like everyone was expecting! One thing that scientists do understand is that while life has changed greatly over long periods of time, it does not do well with quick changes to its environment, yet they are quite a bit of evidence that yes big changes to habitat can be overcome by many species that only 30 years ago was never thought possible!
Mankind and our levels of knowledge are nowhere nearly as high as we believe. In some ways, we can work wonders with ever-increasing technology (that so very few understand) yet we are so primitive about our planet's past and how life has had to adapt to every changing atmospheric gasses and their densities, over the total 3.5 billion years of the Earth having abundant carbon-based life on it! Our planet no longer has abundant carbon-based life on it, and has not had an abundant life, for many millions of years! Yet how are we supposed to know that, we see what the planet does have and believe that what we are used to is the normal state of life on the planet! Would I like to have lived when dinosaurs ruled the planet? Absolutely NOT, it would not have been the meat-eating dinosaurs that we would have to fear, but death would have lurked around every corner, and it would have been the smallest of life that we would have had no defense for!
Every 50 years or so, scientists have a major change in how we see the planet, yet we still believe that now we understand! When new knowledge has almost always proved that belief wrong! I myself have to remember that so much that I think I understand, has been discovered in the last few years by others who were not even looking for what they discovered, or did not understand what their discovery meant! Many times new knowledge is not seen as new knowledge, but simply reporting on information that can now be understood without digging any deeper into what that means! When the probe sent back the information about the atmosphere of Venus, the first thing everyone said was "See what run-a-way greenhouse gasses do to a planet's atmosphere"! Yet why didn't they ask why only 824-863 degrees Fahrenheit on a planet with 353,000 times more carbon dioxide in its atmosphere yet only about 775 degrees warmer than the Earth's average temperature something does not add up! The complex relationship between sunlight and greenhouse gasses in a planet's atmosphere can not at this time be fully or perhaps more accurately defined without much more knowledge than probes' descent into Venus's atmosphere.
So many times I have to do so much research because I feel so out of my depths when talking about topics that do not seem to have defined parameters that I feel comfortable working with, there are many people around the planet, that could do much more justice on many of the topic's that I have to talk about because no one else will! Give me a house to build, and I can do everything necessary to make a good home. That is a walk in the park compared to designing all of the different issues that need to be addressed for repairing the planet's temperature-regulating abilities, thereby saving all carbon-based life for as long as mankind can remain as a viable species on the planet!!!
Any of you out there would have been told 1) that mankind is all to blame, ask yourself this question if over 25% of the planet is either arid or semi-arid if somehow all of a sudden there was abundant plant life everywhere even in the cold deserts? If that happened all at once then all C-3 plant life would suddenly go into shock because there is not enough carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for there to be abundant planet life everywhere on the surface of the planet without lowering the levels below 150 parts per million which is the level where these types of plants die, this was of course back when carbon dioxide levels were around 280 parts per million! Of course, ice ages also start when carbon dioxide levels drop between 180 - 200 parts per million. 2) That the carbon cycle is perfect! Then where did 100,000,000 gigatonnes of limestone that most scientists will tell you are staged on the planet, the vast majority, once sea life, come from? If you have no answer to either question, then read "Life Cycle of a Planet by Daniel James Kadavy" All of the answers are there!
Comments
Post a Comment