Life Cycle of a Planet

      Perpetual motion theory says that life can never continue forever without interference, many feel that the sun's energy is the necessary interference. No, it is simply energy, only one very important part of life. The greenhouse gasses that exist on this planet are another very important part, necessary for most life, without with all water on the surface of the planet would be frozen, and the greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide is very, very important for life to use as one of the major building blocks of that life. Water is also essential for life, then we come to other nutrients that are needed but in smaller amounts but without, are again essential for life. These include many trace minerals such as, iron, copper, manganese, chlorine, zinc, boron, nickel, molybdenum, and perhaps others that are so rarely in short supply that we do not know about them.     All past extinction events can not be put into groups or categories without the complete understanding that relates to each

       I am simply one person on the planet who is forever trying to learn. I am not so wrapped up in trying to make a million dollars, and impress people with what I have or own, so that I never have had to work much for others to make a living, meaning that I never had to bow down to others for a paycheck. I am sure that many people think what a waste when they see me. I have a lovely wife and she raised our two wonderful daughters, that we both are very proud of yet like so many children so very different from each other. There is never one path that people must follow to live life, and it would be a very boring world if there was only one way forward. But what many are now choosing is so anti-social, anti-beneficial, anti-respectful for the betterment of life, yet they put it under the heading of personal choice, when it really comes down to, is don't tell me what to do or believe in, let me believe what sounds right, for how I choose to live! This is irregardless of the cost t

     Does entropy come into question in an open system such as life on Earth since as long as the sun shines, energy is being sent to earth constantly? The answer to that question is really what the "plan" is all about, how quickly sunlight is either reflexed back into space after hitting ice or snow or cloud cover, changed into heat as it comes into contact with greenhouse gasses, converted into energy for growth when it hit plant life, or directly converted into heat as it hits unprotected soils! All of these seemingly random actions, mankind can do a lot to make these actions not random at all. And in the process, repair the planet, not just for mankind and the extreme weather that has become the norm, but for all carbon-based life.     Then we start to talk about mineral entropy caused by the sequestration of life, just as energy entropy ends up with energy so diluted that it becomes unable to be used, mineral entropy takes necessary nutrients for life and displaces and d

      If the choice was to fix the planet and yet hurt mankind in doing so, then whatever plan was being proposed would face serious challenges to being adopted. That is much of the problem that we are seeing now, many scientists are saying that we must make fossil fuel so expensive that switching to electric, wind, solar, will look better because of the saving. So much like taxing cigarettes to discourage its use and still make a lot of money for the governments from those who either can not quit or like it too much to quit.      The very fact that what scientists want is both very expensive and requires sacrifice from just about everyone on the planet in an attempt to become carbon-neutral, while at the same time does not do what is needed to be done.      I have been trying to explain why scientists are so determined to lay the blame for Global Warming and Climate Change directly at mankind's feet. So let's imagine a giant telescope out in space looking directly at Earth fro

      I loved the Harry Potter series, knowing full well that it was just great escape fantasy, as was The Lords of the Rings, before that. Even such series as The Earth Children's series about an orphaned child Alya that could have actually happened, based on scientific discoveries of our ancestors during the last ice-age, not actually the story itself but how knowledge was learned 25,000 years ago! But we use imaginary creatures, beliefs, on our children from a very young age, so how are they to tell facts from fiction? Does mankind even understand enough of how life works to know what is a fact? Even if we understand some things, how can we be sure that everything that we understand about something is completely correct! Do we even know enough about the red-light shift to determine distances in space correctly, maybe, maybe not? We believe that with our best telescopes that we can almost see far enough back in time to the "big bang" which is estimated at 14.6 billion y

     This is the most important subject of any generation that man has ever been exposed to! Yes, proving that the planet was round and goes around the sun, was very needed knowledge but it really does not affect the average person! But the fact that all carbon-based life on this planet has an end date, without mankind interfering with and maintaining, both the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and increasing plant coverage and the increasing cloud cover that results from that increased plant coverage should be front-page news on every paper, news broadcast, and scientific journal on the planet! Yet 2 years 3 months have gone by since "The complete cause and solution to Global Warming by Daniel James Kadavy" with at least 325 different people around the planet at least looking at that 12 page-paper. WHY, WHY, WHY, Nothing, no one even telling me that I am the dumbest person on the planet which seems to be a common reaction on the internet from what I have seen.       Yet every

    The three problems are all unfortunately manmade obstacles. The first is based on mankind's need to place everything on an economical footing, meaning how to make money with the least amount of expense. A good example of this was when a new inexpensive way  of mining for gold was found in the 1870s, it was called "hydraulic mining" and you basically washed a mountain away with high-pressure water to extract the gold through the resulting slurry. You can imagine the terrible scenes of a pristine mountainside reduced to a trash heap of loose rock gravel and dead trees and vegetation all to make a company rich! This was only allowed for a few years in America, by 1884 the practice was stopped but only because of a lawsuit claiming downstream damage to farmland so money versus money, not the moral objection of raping the land! This type of abuse of the planet's natural resources has made the argument that mankind is a parasitic growth on the planet, not a species that