431 It is a very good thing that the "plan" will not just repair the temperature-regulating abilities of the planet, but also improve mankind economically.

     If the choice was to fix the planet and yet hurt mankind in doing so, then whatever plan was being proposed would face serious challenges to being adopted. That is much of the problem that we are seeing now, many scientists are saying that we must make fossil fuel so expensive that switching to electric, wind, solar, will look better because of the saving. So much like taxing cigarettes to discourage its use and still make a lot of money for the governments from those who either can not quit or like it too much to quit. 

    The very fact that what scientists want is both very expensive and requires sacrifice from just about everyone on the planet in an attempt to become carbon-neutral, while at the same time does not do what is needed to be done.

     I have been trying to explain why scientists are so determined to lay the blame for Global Warming and Climate Change directly at mankind's feet. So let's imagine a giant telescope out in space looking directly at Earth from a million miles away, and what this telescope sees is "time" from the very first coming together of the space debris to form the planet around 4.5 billion years ago and the corresponding atmosphere thousands of times denser than now "mainly made up of hydrogen gas" the most abundant element in the universe there are other gases in the atmosphere, helium, ammonia, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen and just traces of other gases, but really no oxygen at all. Constant bombardment from space is the rule of thumb for the next 500 million years, and a lighter atmosphere, as the gravitational strength of the new planet is not strong enough to keep the lightest and most common gases tied to the planet. So with hydrogen, helium, and ammonia drifting off into space, carbon dioxide and methane become the most common gases left in the atmosphere. Yet the atmospheric density is still around a hundred times as thick as present-day levels with carbon dioxide making up around 96% of the ancient atmosphere. With the corresponding levels present in the waters of the planet.

     Life first starts in the protected oceans of the planet, and the most prevailing material to start that life is carbon, and the internal heat of a still-warm planet working as the energy source. Life in the ocean is the most ancient of all, and by necessarily was all anaerobic by design yet that very form of life produce oxygen as a waste product which over hundreds of millions of years continued the conversation of carbon dioxide and energy into carbon necessary for growth and oxygen as a waste by-product that slowly increased in concentration to the point where it began being poisonous to the life that produced it. This action of life being its own cause of extinction has been one of the overlying factors of life on this planet from the very beginning. Whether you call this process, evolution or adaptation the results are the same. As life slowly changes the conditions on the planet, both by changing the atmospheric gasses available by density, and by composition, but also the weather on the planet by increasing or decreasing the water in the atmosphere and the corresponding cloud-cover that either increases the reflection of sunlight or decreases the reflection of sunlight from striking the ground so that temperatures either rises or falls. Carbon-based life on the planet truly began being in abundance around 3.5 billion years ago. The Earth at that time was mainly covered by water, the land masses that we enjoy today are a result of tectonic plate movement that rises the plates in some areas and lowers the plates in others, thereby making much deeper oceans and taller mountains. This plate movement also has created continents and created the strong ocean and air currents that at times have both warmed the planet and cooled the planet.  

    The great telescope in the sky would have been witness to all of these changes that are never-ending, yet all mankind can see is what we have recorded since we have been able to record, a minuscule point in time stretching back perhaps 6,000 years, while life goes back 3,500,000,000 years or so. So what timeline do scientists deem important? Only the last 200 years, "A" single super-volcanic event would have brought back more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere in a few short years than all of the carbon mankind has reintroduced in our entire existence, and this has happened many times in the past, yes with serious consequences! But our planet is ever so slowly cooling down reducing but not eliminating the possibility of another super-volcanic event! What mankind sees as stability at an overall point in time is really the by-product of the planet itself removing asteroid strikes by clearing out many of the big rocks by being hit by them in the first 500,000,000 years, and reducing volcanic events, by slowing losing much of its internal heat by both the slow decaying of radioactive material into less heat-producing sister elements, and the slow loss of heat by convection, to the surface of the planet. The use of an analogy would be 3.5 billion years ago we could have seen the planet as a teenager in the prime of its life but always willing to mix it up, now we could see the planet as that same person set near the end of its life and needing doctors and medicine to keep going but with a miracle cure just around the corner called mankind, but only if we are willing to look at the reason why this young teenager turned into an old man and not just because mankind learned to smoke!

    Guys, without you telling others, and since it seems the same 25 places or so that download my posts have not increased in number I do not believe that anyone is telling others, we can not change anything. Go forth and cry out into the no longer wilderness what mankind needs to do! Reach me in Nebraska at 402-890-7946, or contact me at daniel.kadavy212@gmail.com, or tell others about the now 430 posts they can go to https://lifecycleofaplanet.blogspot.com  Thank You, I think, Dan