Life Cycle of a Planet

 And for some reason, it seems to come as a shock that the carbon dioxide levels in the water were over 20 times higher than anywhere else on the planet. How could that come as a shock, this water was what water all over the planet was like prior to there being any ice on the planet, just over 3,000,000 years ago. This water is simply a time capsule of what the planet was like prior to the planet cooling enough to start snow and ice to develop. It is no different than amber acting as a time capsule of the atmosphere when the resin first seeped from the tree.        Is there, no one out there who understands how limestone is made, 100 million gigatonnes of it on the planet that was once life, and it just magically appeared fully formed without coming from somewhere? NO, it was all stored in the atmosphere and waters of this great planet since the planet was formed from the cosmic dust that was once other stars that exploded many billions of years ago. Not rocket science guys, how the pl

      Everyone on the planet is put into some type of box, where they are born, their sex, the color of their skin, if educated or not, even their appearance, and who their parents are, all play a role in how someone is judged. Of course, that box will vary greatly depending on where anyone is at and can change over a lifetime in many ways. The one box that remains the most consistent, is  those born to wealth and power.     The "plan" does not care for whatever box anyone is in, it deals with saving all carbon-based life on the planet while improving the weather so that extreme weather is significantly reduced. The current economics of the planet leaves many people without hope for a better future, mainly because of the boxes that have been placed around them. But because the "plan" is so all-encompassing, and will require hundreds of millions of people to move water to the arid and semi-arid areas of the planet and then start the job of re-planting those areas, al

I have hesitated to call the "plan" Re-terraforming the planet because of the monumentous design that those words conjure up! Terraforming means to make Earth-like, so yes the "plan" re-makes the atmosphere of the planet back into what it was 3 million years ago, yet with a lot of ice still being staged on the planet, which was not on the planet 3 million years ago.      With mankind working together to re-build the temperature-regulating ability of the planet, in as little as 30 years or one generation much of the planet would be well on its way of self temperature-regulation with little additional input needed from mankind. It all comes down to maintaining plant coverage of soils, and the corresponding plant respiration producing increased cloud coverage, to both reduce sunlight being changed into heat and increase "now" consistent rainfall.      The "plan" has many aspects to it and they all produce money in the long run, if there is anywhere

    Instead, it has simply become another  tool for those who do not like change to spout that agenda, without actually understanding what they are saying. Safely they feel can always be found in uniformity and knowing what to expect. Life and how mankind deals with it is by its very nature always changing. I see so many types of people using the internet, but there are two very distinct types of people on the internet, those who are always looking for the next "New fad or way to be different from their parents". And those who try and justify the past as a better time and way of life. Both fail terribly, in seeing anyone else's point of view! Both types have giant blinders on limiting their views of anything not in their sphere of normal consciousness. To both groups, that is perfectly okay for them to see only what they want to see.     But can we not use the internet as it has great potential for discussion. Instead, we only go to sites that spout our own views and if s

      Stopped is not the right word because in between each ice-age there remained a lot of ice on the planet that is not normal for the planet! During the majority of the life of the planet, ice has not been present in any real amount, only when the balance between the carbon dioxide levels in the planet atmosphere and the amount of energy being received from the sun, starts reducing the overall temperature enough for ice to become more likely. Somewhere around 3 million years ago, the planet started staging ice on the planet, and around 2.5 million years ago that ice had grown enough to reach places that mankind could verify as places that ice was known not to normally occur.     There have been around 18 advances and then retreat of ice over the last 2.5-2.6 million years, each period of ice advances have been many times longer than the periods when ice was retreating, As you may remember I started researching the reasons for this when I was only around 8 years old, and it took me u

     This is the fact that so many people will have the most trouble understanding. Our whole lives we have been taught that what the Earth is going through can always be tied back to mankind's actions. With good cause, the extinction of many species of plants and animals can be directly linked to mankind's changing of their habitat and or by the overuse of life for mankind's benefit. An example of that is the destruction of millions of bison that had once roamed North America while the species was not wipeout, it was down to only around 1000 living animals that were found in Canada. Many scientists will tell you that such a small amount of breeding stock especially from a species that has only a few males breeding many females will reduce the genetic material available for future generations. This limitation may have many unforeseen consequences down through the years.     Man-made pollution is another area that we can easily see having negative effects on the life of the

       Did that do what mankind was hoping for, less extreme weather, fewer droughts, and less flooding and hurricane developments? That depends on how they achieved those levels, if they simply built massive carbon dioxide capture systems, then no! The increased heat caused by sunlight hitting the ground all around the globe wherever arid and semi-arid still exist will still be the driving factor for extreme weather, and with no increasing cloud cover to mitigate energy received from the sun, extreme weather will still cause expensive repair's from mankind! There may be a modest decrease in extreme weather and a good public relations firm could make it seem like greater catastrophes were avoided and the trillions of dollars spent over those 50 years were justified.     Lower levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will of course relate to lower c-3 crop yields around the planet increasing food shortages unless mankind has reduced meat production and increased vegetable producti