I have talked about perpetual motion, and even with the sun's energy, why it can not exist on life!

Perpetual motion, When we try and make the "unmakeable" perpetual motion machine on Earth, there are normally two things that stop us, friction, and gravity. Okay you think, on a planetary scale neither would work against such a machine called "life", plus the energy necessary for such a machine called "life" is from the sun, which produces more energy then this machine would ever need. If we do not have to worry about friction, gravity, or an unending power source, what is the problem? Its materials! Every farmer knows that when crops are planted and then harvested, you are taking material out of the soils, that sooner or later are going to have to be replaced. Okay, you think, in nature, life is not removed to feed humanity, and then not replaced, because even if deer eats grass, everything is still there just in another form that is normally able to be recycled. So if mankind was not on the planet. won't life simply go on like it has forever? This is where "perpetual motion can not happen" comes into play! No matter how efficient a planet recycling is, it can never be 100%, if that was the case there would not be 60,000,000,000 - 100,000,000,000 gigatonnes of limestone on the planet, all created from past carbon-based life! We are not even counting all of the fossil-fuels, or eroded plant life washed down into the oceans every day and then buried in the great delta of the planet. Okay, scientist understand about carbon sequestration, what makes me think, that after having abundant life on this planet for billions of years, that we are just now running low of carbon? Three things, first the ice age that started around 2.5 million years ago, we were in, until mankind added around 150 parts per million of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, second the huge increase in arid and semi-arid areas around the planet, since the start of the ice age. Three, the numbers, there is only around 45,860 gigatonnes of carbon in forms that are available for life left on the planet, most of that is in the oceans (39,000 gigatonnes) yet according to scientist the planet sequestrators around 10 gigatonnes every year, and the planet by volcano's and other ways only return about 3 gigatonnes, back into the atmosphere for a net loss of around 7 gigatonnes every year. (this does not take into account what mankind has returned and is returning). Starting with 45,860 gigatonnes and divide by 7 gigatonnes and you get 6551 years until there is no carbon left at all! So how long does the planet have left, before life is gone? If mankind was not on the planet then "My" best guess is in the neighborhood of one thousand years before only c-4 and cam plants will be able to survive such low number, but it could be much less as the planet would have entered the next and never-ending glaciation period. Reach me in the USA at 402-890-7946 or by e-mail if you do not want to talk @  < danielkadavy212@gmail.com > Keep reading and telling others, your, Daniel Kadavy

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Global Warming and Climate Change} Lost of available carbon vs. too much C02 in atmosphere!

503 DIII Humanity is the only species that have to pay to live and survive. while there are a few exceptions to this rule, they are few and far between!

CCLXXIV Global Warming and Climate Change} Let's talk more, about the 50,000 gigatonnes of available carbon, that is left for all life on the planet!