+Q+ Part 4 of Q To repair something in life, we normally need to fix that which broke, if a wire breaks that conducts electricity, that is where to fix it.

        We do not try and reroute the electricity to another point and bypass the break, but that is what climate scientists are telling us we need to do. To repair the lost temperature regulation ability that the planet has lost, they feel is not at issue, the only thing at issue is the extra 150 parts per million of carbon dioxide that mankind has added to the atmosphere! Arid and semi-arid formations are the underlying problem that needs to be addressed, everything else is only a symptom, not causation of what the planet and all carbon-based life are facing. If a bearing is starting to go out, on some machine you can add oil or grease to improve its ability to work, but only as an interim solution, not as a long-term solution to a problem that only replacement can repair. Removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by sequestration is much the same as greasing a bearing that no longer meets the specs, instead of replacing the bearing itself does. Mankind has a long history of temporary solutions to long-term problems that cost more in the long run. I am amazed that some things that were built years and even centuries ago that still work with today's modern societies. The Brooklyn Bridge is a modern marvel, carrying loads that it was never intended to carry for over 137 years, many of Europe's water systems, many dating as far back as the Romans, sewers, bridges, and roads fall in these same categories, even church's and dwellings there have pasted the test of time. Modern society has greatly changed both the infrastructure needs of mankind and no longer look for that infrastructure to last beyond several decades at best, we seem to no longer take pride in things that outlast a lifetime. Always looking for new and improved, instead of enjoying stability and quality of workmanship. Colleges when trying to recruit their student-athletes, always talk their board of directors into those new state-of-the-art facilities they say are necessary to be competitive even if the quality is only skin deep, and much will need to be replaced each year to achieve that fresh new look, that seems to be necessary to sell incoming athletes.         Many will say that new innovations need new infrastructure, not necessarily correct, most new innovations normally means, more compacted in the area needed to accomplish the same results, not more area needed, to serve the same size of whatever your infrastructure needs were originally. One aspect of modern construction that tends to make large structures fail in shorter periods of time is how we no longer use arches for large spans, but we have gone back to using mass and depth to achieve long free spans of bridges, that ends up having much shorter "use of life" then arch spans do. While this does limit the length of time in construction as these super long spans can be built off-site and installed with cranes that can handle loads exceeding one hundred tons, while stone, brick, and concrete arches, are much more labor-intensive but will last many times longer than any other type of bridge construction out there. Plus much more resistance to earthquake-caused failures. As always slightly off script, but I can be reached by phone at 402-890-7946, or by G-mail at <daniel.kadavy212@gmail.com> or to read more at <https://lifecycleofaplanet.blogspot.com> Thank you and the need to tell others is the most important thing you can do today, Dan.