388 I was talking about how to decide if a planet had or has life on it and using both the density of the atmosphere and amount of CO2 left in it?

         To come to those conclusions, I allow myself the latitudes to make such sweeping observations, for the very reason that I am NOT a scientist, but I would much rather be proven wrong about any of the ideas and observations that others have taken so long in documenting! For if the world needs to wait until all scientists come to the same conclusion, well let's just say that a certain very hot place will freeze over! Working within the restrictions that we can only move forward when there is a consensus from the powers that be, would doom this planet and all carbon-based life to a grim future. Nothing that I put forth in using the "plan" will hinder or not do what just about everyone who believes that mankind needs to readjust how we deal with Global Warming and Climate Change. Since the "plan" is by far the cheapest both in the beginning and long-term, and solves so many other aspects of what mankind ourselves are faced with in terms of the "have and the have-nots". There should be no reason, not to use the "plan" for how to proceed!!!                                      As to reducing man's need for fossil fuels use, anyway, that shows us how to do so, is simply a plus, be that using wind, solar, tidal, geothermal, nuclear, or the collection of methane gas from all of mankind's landfills and sewage treatment plants, or something that we have not yet, thought of. Anything that will extend fossil fuels into the future will be a great help in allowing carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere to be maintained at the correct and necessary levels, once we replant, all of the arid and semi-arid areas of the planet that can be replanted!                                                                                                                                         Scientists around the planet, need to be pointed in the right direction, to begin understanding the true nature of the planet and mankind's problem. Activists, on both sides of Global Warming and Climate Change, are simply reacting to misinterpreted data, that is only based on the last hundred years of knowledge of what mankind has caused. In doing so, we have started down a path that will not lead us where we and all carbon-based life need to arrive at, for there to be a long-term future for life on this Great Planet! I can be reached by phone 24/7 @ 1-402-890-7946, or you can contact me @ <daniel.kadavy212@gmail.com> or read more @ https://lifecycleofaplanet.blogspot.com Thank you and really we need to tell others, in the hope of starting a conversation on the most pressing issue mankind and the planet will ever face! Dan

    On taking the information of the atmosphere of other planet's we can go a long way on deciding whether or not any large quantity of life ever existed on any planet! How much carbon dioxide is still in the atmosphere, how dense is the atmosphere, is there any oxygen in the atmosphere? All of these answers will point us towards the great question of if life, how much, and for how long!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Global Warming and Climate Change} Lost of available carbon vs. too much C02 in atmosphere!

Global Warming and "The life cycle of a planet" By Daniel Kadavy  402-890-7946  Cortland Nebraska                                                                                                                                                                                                                The planet is running out of carbon, which is the mainstay of all life on the planet! Something has to be done to mitigate this. And yet Global Warming is changing ...
Read more

503 DIII Humanity is the only species that have to pay to live and survive. while there are a few exceptions to this rule, they are few and far between!

What does that say about how we live? It means that we have very little say in most aspects of our lives if we wish to live in a house, we must pay for that privilege with taxes, energy, insurance, maintenance, and keeping the standards that each place puts upon the owners, cutting grass, moving snow, and so many other requirements to fall within acceptable parameters of society! We must obey laws we may disagree with, nor have any input in their adoption or application! While there are many different arrangements of governments around the world, even the ones that are voted in or out of power by the masses are never truly fair in explaining to their constituents what they are going to attempt to do if elected! Yet this is the world we live in while we attempt to understand what 3.5 billion years of carbon sequestration have forced our planet to go through, including almost every single extinction event that has occurred in the history of our planet!  So the problem that we face is...
Read more

CCLXXIV Global Warming and Climate Change} Let's talk more, about the 50,000 gigatonnes of available carbon, that is left for all life on the planet!

First, how do scientist's come up with around 50,000 gigatonnes of available carbon left on the planet? Some of the amounts can be directly measured, how much there is in the atmosphere is one of the most researched numbers on the planet! That figure of 415 parts per million equals around 800 gigatonnes of carbon, in the form of carbon dioxide. 560 gigatonnes in plant and animal life are based on both satellite images for how much plant life is on the planet during the year and measurements that were taken by hundreds of people every year all around the planet. How much soil carbon, is taken by averaging soil carbon from all over the globe this amount is said to be 1,500 gigatonnes. The amount of "fossil Fuels" is the amount of "known" reserves found by mainly oil accompanying who has been looking as far and fast as they can, that amount is estimated at 4,000 gigatonnes (The carbon sequestrated in fossil fuels would only become available if mankind continues to ...
Read more