Life Cycle of a Planet

       The most important reason is that without mankind's intervention in the right direction, our planet's carbon-based life forms are doomed. (Of course, this does include us) Will that happen? That is a hard question to answer, for sooner or later others will start to understand what I am trying to tell everyone now. But how far will we have gone in the completely wrong direction before this happens? And if we have spent trillions of dollars already in removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, who will believe that we now understand what needs to be done and where will we go to rebuild the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to allow the replanting of most of the arid and semi-arid areas of the planet. Once we do achieve the replanting of these areas, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere must still be around 300 parts per million or more to prevent stresses of the C-3 plantlife due to the need for their stomas to open wide enough to allow enoug...

      Showing this bottle was to prove that a perfect recycling ecosystem could be achieved, and yet somehow it was not being done due to mankind's interference on the planet. Then the day before this, someone ask the question what would happen if we grew plants in all of the deserts of the planet, would that stop climate change? The answer received, was that doing so would greatly damage the tropical rainforest in South America because the winds that raced across the Sahara Desert could no longer take needed iron particles across the Atlantic Ocean fertilizing those rainforests causing great damage and most likely killing those forests from a lack of necessary micro-nutrients! We like to pick and chose answers that fulfill our perception of the planet. Concerning the glass bottle, in that scenario, everything is being perfectly recycled and the temperature that the bottle has been kept in is ideal for plant life, but that is not how the eco-system of the planet works. Er...

       They tell us that size and the corresponding gravity, define each planet's atmosphere! With the one exception, The atmosphere of the Earth started by being almost identical to our sister planet Venus, but once carbon-based life began on Earth, the Symbiotic relationship that was created by life, The Sun, and carbon dioxide sequestration, over time allowed a vast ever-changing display of what Earth could support in terms of carbon-based life! Life does not just cause, carbon dioxide to be sequestrated out of the atmosphere, but as all life is directly affected by how much carbon is available it is this that makes life's need to constantly adapt, as a requirement for the continuation of life to be able to proceed.     Jupiter, by far the largest of the planets, has been able to retain most of the gases that first formed its atmosphere and as such should be considered as a baseline for all of the other planets' atmospheres, and the Planet Mars atmospher...

     Or can be convinced that it will both, save money and greatly reduce material put into landfills around the planet!  That is by using lightweight break resistance glass containers for as many foods and commodities as possible. By using the retail outlets as the point of distribution and manufacturers sending material in very large containers that could be broken down to repackage into the re-cyclable lightweight glass containers, without having to go all the way back to the manufacturers.      While this is one of the shortest posts I have ever posted, it is just to show everyone how important it is for repairing so many problems that the planet is facing due to mankind! Phone me in the USA at 402-890-7946, my E-mail is   daniel.kadavy212@gmail.com    My blogsite is https://lifecycleofaplanet.blogspot.com   Thank you, Dan 

     I am not Edison, Einstein, Tesla, Galileo, or Da Vinci. not even close. But I also did not fall into the category that says that mankind is inherently evil, and we were placed here on Earth to prove to "A God" that we can overcome our baser instincts to be worthy of heaven when we die! We see countless evidence of mankind's greed for power and dominance, which seems to many, to show that mankind can indeed be inherently evil! While I see that as an exception, not as proof, and those that choose to follow such people as simply allowing themselves to be used and manipulated by playing on fears and hope that somehow their rulers are being guided by a higher power!     What I see is that mankind has had to overcome so much lack of knowledge and understanding, and yet making tremendous advances that still leave us, just at the beginning of true knowledge! Since I see mankind as a species much like every other species on the planet, living the best that we can, u...

     But that interest shows up as a criticism of why there is no peer review of the idea! I am not a scientist and peer review is not set up for people such as me! Theoretically, anyone can submit a "paper" for peer review, but the chance of that happening, that someone will review a paper from a nobody, especially on such a derisive subject with such an unorthodox point of view! A vast number of scientists would see this as a career-ending endeavor, to even agree to review "Life Cycle of a Planet by Daniel James Kadavy"!      Perhaps, somewhere someone in the scientific community is looking at my short  12-page paper, but I would be the last to know, thinking that I would want to talk to everyone interested and no matter what would come or not come of this scrutiny, career's could very easily be ruined!     Science is one of those realms that can only abide so long with a major deviation within or outside of their control. Yet 40 years is n...