463 Mankind appearance at just the moment that only a thinking an acting species was necessary for all life. Has to be Absolutely Impossible, right?

     That question does seem to follow if we think of evolution as not being driven by any outside force other than what makes life more likely to continue? But what if it is slightly more than that, what if, as gases in the atmosphere change, pressure is put on for specific adaptations to become necessary for life to continue. Far in the past, some scientists feel that air-borne bacteria became so prevalent that they ended up blocking enough of the sunlight to force the planet into a glaciation phase. Yet, at the same time, they used carbon from the floor of the great oceans, allowing the bacteria to become so numerous bringing this partially trapped carbon back into the atmosphere which should have warmed up the planet not cooled it down. Was this one of the planet's experiments on extending carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by speeding up part of the carbon cycle to do that, yet with negative results? 

    I have wondered if the Beaver and how it lives and eats, was and is another example of nature trying to solve the planet's overachievement of mid-range carbon storage in tree growth? From what I have read, beavers were so prolific that many if not all of the great cities of Europe were founded on lands that were both cleared by beavers and raised up above the river's edge by them? Doing much of what mankind did with early agriculture in speeding up both the short-term and mid-term carbon storage, preventing the next ice-age from starting around 3,500 years ago! Perhaps in the distant past, there have been other attempts by nature that we have yet to understand. Of course, ice-ages themselves restrict tree growth and buried billions of tonnes of carbon, and as the ice sheets would recede, much of this trapped carbon is re-introduced back into the atmosphere slowly, helping to extend inter-glacial periods! That may explain why the normal period of 10,000 years of interglacial periods up until the one we are in now, was so consistent in their length of duration!

    Are any of these scenarios, able to be re-created in a laboratory setting so as to be observable, and therefore repeated with all of the necessary interactions with life? Only if you are willing to put limits on just how much of the interactions of life you are willing to not use!

     What I put forth are only possibilities, yet are the best explanations but however not fact-based knowledge. I am trying to get people to see the interactions of life, (not as A makes B making C happen), but as a mathematical progression when speaking of the interactions of life. Instead what we have been taught is (A-Mankind is a disease on the planet, B-we are also a disease for ourselves, C-we increased the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by almost every action that we do, therefore, D-we are the only cause of Global Warming and therefore Climate Change!)

    There is no way that I could put down the right linear frame of reference of how the planet got here, Not only do I not understand enough to do so, but even if I did understand the total process, we are talking about interactions of 3.5 billion years of carbon-based life on the planet, a Sun that simply affects almost all of that life and it too is constantly changing, and even the internal heat and movement of the planet's plate tectonics are slowly slowing down, having a dramatic influence on carbon storage and replenishment of long-term carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere! But to me, without mankind on this planet, it all points to the next extinction event that I see no way out of! But Mankind is on the planet and we (and perhaps the Beavers) have already stopped the planet from entering into, the next-last and never-ending ice-age that should have started around 3,500 years ago! I understand that not only do I repeat myself A-LOT but in trying to reach people who must re-learn so much misunderstanding on how our planet works, but we yet are so very near in time to believing that the planet is only 6-7 thousand years old, comprised of only Earth, water, air, and fire. yet everything revolved around us! A much simpler concept, and we still wake up every morning, work, play, eat and sleep, and raise our young in either belief system.

    I understand why we would be seen immediately as the prime candidate for being the "cause" and that fact alone has been the driving force behind what scientists have been using in their search for "cause and effect"! If the ability of the Earth to be able to sustain life forever is a given fact, then what other cause could Global Warming and Climate Change arise from? Mankind's overall need for conformity and the security of knowing that the Sun and Earth will always be there with very little, if any change, is very reassuring! Yet neither mankind nor the beavers are to blame for carbon sequestration, yet without it, mankind would not be here either. The more life that a planet has and not just on the edge of life, but flourishing, then the greater the ability for the planet to be able to overcome minor changes in the gasses in the atmosphere, without causing major changes to both the climate and the extreme weather that would have occurred!

    If anyone out there knows of a way to get this necessary information into a conversation, we must start sooner or later. Please do so or tell me how to do so. I can be reached by phone @ 402-890-7946, or by g-mail @ daniel.kadavy212@gmail.com   or to read so much more @    https:lifecycleofaplanet.blogspot.com Thank you, Dan