Life Cycle of a Planet

But it is going to take, noted scientists to produce the needed documentation before the population of the planet will take note. While this is the proper way, it is also time-consuming, and someone has to pay for it. Even once it is done there will be conflict inside the scientific community about what this all means. In the meantime, we know that stopping the polluted rivers of the planet from entering the oceans will help clean them up, and this river water is still excellent water for growing plant life (with a little clean up where needed ) and we know that increasing the plant life around the planet will reduce the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. And we know that there is a very large population of refugees around the planet, that are basically an unwanted problem for most country's. So even if scientists take years to come to the right conclusion that took me 40 years to do so, let's start now because my "solution" will only heal the planet of excess carbon d...

While this works for most of life, it work's very well in predicting temperature regulation on the planet. Using millions of years not only a few thousand that mankind has been concerned with, that is because we have to go back in time prior to the formation of so many arid and semi-arid areas of the planet. Otherwise, we are not comparing like conditions, and that is the rub, in all of the planet's history that we know about, never has there been 25% of the landmass fitting those descriptions! But now with a little over 400 parts per million of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, we can replant much of the areas of the planet that has lost its plant cover, and still keep the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere above the numbers needed to maintain that growth and then the planet will now reacquire almost all of its temperature regulating ability! ( Some loss will still be on the planet, due to all of the ice that the planet stages that were not here 3,000,000 years ago. But with a l...

History if rife with truth, half-truths, condemnations, and outright lies when it comes to information, that may put someone else's belief's or livelihood, in turmoil. This means that mankind has a long history of how to achieve those goals that can best fit their own desires, whether or not they're in the best interest of science or society! And scientists have also played a role in this, on both sides of these issues. Truth will out, sorry no, maybe money will out, is how it usually works. But this issue of planetary life, cannot be played with when all life on this planet is at stake, even if it is in the near future, and not tomorrow. For if it is allowed to be compromised for money today, then the next generation will simply continue with the mistaken idea of what the planet is going thought!  Right now, we need to decide the best way forward, in many ways this is a perfect time, we have a very large workforce waiting to be wanted and needed, there is a large groundswe...

The true nature of the planet running out of carbon, because it would be less complicated to simply explain how to repair global warming by replanting the arid and semi-arid areas of the planet. And not get too in-depth as to why that would be the only correct way to go about fixing the problem. Meaning that it also repairs the temperature regulating ability that the planet has partially lost due to the creation of so many heat-producing areas of the planet, caused by the lack of adequate carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, that allows all areas of the planet to have plant life in abundance! When fully planted this planet uses moisture in the atmosphere as cloud cover to both blanket the planet to keep the surface, warmth in at night and reflexing much of the sun's ray's during the day to prevent too much heat energy reaching the planet's surface. I truly feel that withholding this truth would be the same as saying that mankind can not handle the truth, and only certain peopl...

When you really think about life on any planet, every time one extinction event happens, something is waiting in the wings, to take advantage of that for their own gain. And it always seems to be an upwards event, not life in a simpler form but in a more advanced form. The need for evolution to get more complex, seems to be hard-wired into nature, why, if all life required was to be, then would it not be advantageous to be simpler, not more complex. Take a horse for an example, It can survive almost anywhere on the planet as long as there is food to eat and water to drink, and other horses to continue their line. Why was it not at the pinnacle of evolution and then stop? Or perhaps a better question is why are their viruses on the planet especially ones that kill their host and by extension themselves or is the host's death a way of stopping an unwanted mutation of the virus from continuing to mutate in the wrong way so that the virus could not become a parasitic growth in the spec...

been able to affect, the whole of the planetary eco-system. Some people would disagree with this, saying that, "the great oxidation event" made the whole planet's ability for what type of life could now survive, change for the foreseeable future! Not only that, but they would say just like today they poisoned themselves, out of existant! No! That is the history of all life, on this great planet, If you can't adapt to changes in the environment whether caused by yourself, others, or outside influences, then yes your species will go the way of almost all life that was here before you. But now there is a winkle in this narrative, and it will affect all life on the whole planet, not just one species! When most life disappeared after "the great oxidation event" life could, and did continue because all of the basic needs for life were still there. Sun for energy, water for chemical reactions and carbon in the form of carbon dioxide and now there was free oxygen in...

Okay so in 30 years with a workforce of @ least 30 million ex refugees we will be replanting 16% of the surface of the planet, and every year after a new square mile of the area is replanted, the soil sequestration will increase by 15% until we would reach saturation after 8 years then the plant respiration will have increased to  ( I hope you can see where I am going with this all of these numbers that have been completely pulled off of the top of my head ) because no matter how much observation science, could put into a day by day or year by year on the planet. Things change, conditions change, fire, volcanoes, sunspots, how dark the clouds become, just before a storm to change it reflecting sunlight ability, almost every aspect of life can not be accounted for unless you put the whole planet under a roof that is maintained at one temperature and an exact amount of light is given to each plant. Really all we can go on is the distant past, long before mankind even came down from t...