Posts

390 Do we want to save the planet and all carbon-based life that lives on Earth? That answer must be "YES" The only way to do that is to recycle!

            And I mean everything, for the last 3 billion years that there has been life on this planet, the planet has created life and has also slowly locked a very small percentage of that life away! You who have been following my post would know that I have explained how carbon mainly in the form of carbon dioxide has slowly been sequestrated away from the very life that needs it to survive and the only reason that there is still so much carbon-based life on the planet is because of how much carbon was first available on this planet in the beginning! But carbon is not the only, material that is moved from one part of the lifecycle of a planet to somewhere that it becomes harder for life to use it. Mountains have been raised and weathered away, during periods shorter than an "eon" but now, everything is happening at a faster pace because mankind's is terraforming the planet in so many different ways, the vast majority is due to the need for agricult...

389 Mankind lacks direction, unless you call everyone simply trying to find a way to make money to survive, a direction?

           A few people are trying to make life better for others, which is their direction, yet even they have to either be independently wealthy or rely on others for the money that is required to improve lives. What is normally the first question asked when meeting someone, what do you do, and the answer may tell people a lot about how that person sees life.                                                                                                                             Religion has been one of the ways that many have found to find purpose in life, this is especially important for many of the downtrodden on the planet, who see lif...

388 I was talking about how to decide if a planet had or has life on it and using both the density of the atmosphere and amount of CO2 left in it?

            To come to those conclusions, I allow myself the latitudes to make such sweeping observations, for the very reason that I am NOT a scientist, but I would much rather be proven wrong about any of the ideas and observations that others have taken so long in documenting! For if the world needs to wait until all scientists come to the same conclusion, well let's just say that a certain very hot place will freeze over! Working within the restrictions that we can only move forward when there is a consensus from the powers that be, would doom this planet and all carbon-based life to a grim future. Nothing that I put forth in using the "plan" will hinder or not do what just about everyone who believes that mankind needs to readjust how we deal with Global Warming and Climate Change. Since the "plan" is by far the cheapest both in the beginning and long-term, and solves so many other aspects of what mankind ourselves are faced with in terms of the "...

387 posts, How can you tell if a planet has or had life on it? It all depends if scientists can estimate the two following things about a planet?

       First is the gravitational forces, of the planet. the strength of the gravity of a planet will tell them if the planet in question should have maintained its atmosphere since it was first formed. The second thing that scientists need to do is calculate the density and makeup of the planet's atmosphere. There is little reason to believe that how our own solar system was formed should be much different, than any solar system in the universe? I would even go so far as to speculate that because gravity is what causes matter to come together and form Stars, planets, asteroids, and meteoroids, and it is perhaps just chance on when and where material gathers on what is the end product. Yet, the resulting solar system will still end up with the star being at the center with all other material being guided by the massive gravity that the star has.                                  ...

Z is for Zero-in-on the only "plan" that will do everything, rebuild the planet's temperature regulating abilities, plus solving our refugee problem!

       The "plan" if done as I have laid out, will do all of the following. 1)  Go very far in cleaning our seas and oceans of the planet. 2) Rebuild much of the lost temperature-regulating ability of the planet. 3) Reduce, as much of the arid and semi-arid areas of the planet as possible. 4) Decrease and eliminate sea-level changes.  5) Re-build the amount of ice being staged on the planet. 6) Increase the food production of the planet by at least 25%. 7) increase sole property ownership of 20-acre farm sites by at least 100,000,000 spread out over the whole planet. 8) Help greatly in reducing freshwater needs both for drinking and farming around the planet. 9) There will no longer be "red tides" caused by nitrogen run-off. 10) Reduce temperature extremes around the planet and in doing so will decrease extreme weather. 11) Reduce both poverty and the ever-increasing gap between both rich and poor nations. 12) Improve the infrastructure of most of the plane...

Y is still for YOU, The two largest misconceptions, that the scientific world has fostered upon mankind is 1) that the carbon cycle is perfect!

      This should be so easy to see that this is not just wrong, but stops others from even looking at carbon sequestration as part of the problem! The simple fact that there are over 100,000,000 gigatonnes of carbon locked away from life's ability to use this carbon, that shows that perpetual motion is impossible even on a planetary scale! There will always be some small percentage of the whole that does not get recycled. Right now scientists estimate that number at 10 gigatonnes per year, with plate tectonics returning only 3 gigatonnes per year for a loss of around 7 gigatonnes per year. Right now in time, mankind has been both speeding up the existing carbon cycle and reintroducing carbon dioxide via the use of fossil fuels, and in doing so has caused temperature extremes to intensify a warming planet and worsening storms. But mankind has also (unintentionally) prevented the planet from entering into the next and never-ending ice age, which should have started around ...

Y is for You, For without You, the whole idea of how mankind needs to repair the planet by using the "plan" will simply fall into the "dust of time"!

     Yes, I can shout loud and long, on what the planet is facing, but without others listening, checking out the facts, and telling others, who will listen to a 64-year-old home-builder, with no credentials, just using other peoples information to understand what they themselves have not put together.                                                      When you want to build a top-secret machine, that you do not have the ability to do yourself, and still keep it secret, how do you do that? You break down the machine into hundreds of little parts and have a hundred different companies building just one small component and sending each one to you, where you can take these hundreds of parts and make your secret machine with no one else knowing that they had any part in what the end product was to become. This is somewhat how scientific disc...