Life Cycle of a Planet

       Earth is the third planet from the Sun and the only planet known to have life on it in our solar system. It is around 4.6 billion years old, and has had carbon-based life on it for around 3.5 billion years. Ever since life started it has slowly taken over the planet and all carbon-based life has always been in perfect balance with all other carbon-based life! Once the planet started with life that did not use the Sun, and carbon dioxide for direct growth (animal Life) this new form of life used the first life to provide it with energy, again always in perfect balance, if not enough plant life then the animal life would be also be reduced. All life needs to be kept in check so that any one form did not run wild, each form needs to somehow be kept within certain limits! Life then evolved to fill just about every niche and condition on the planet. With the only exception is plant, and insect life in places like the Antarctic. Then in the not to distance past, a n...

    Every point that I  use to explain what the planet is facing is grounded in some of the simplest scientific truths. 1) Yes, there are many people each year that are swindled out of their hard-earned money by someone claiming to have made a perpetual motion machine. Yet this is one of science's earliest understandings that "PERPETUAL MOTION IS IMPOSSIBLE"! Yet even scientists seem to think that somehow Earth is immune to this scientific fact. They tell you that the Sun is continually supplying the planet with energy and that, is what allows perpetual motion to exist. Yet there are many things that life needs to exist, energy is just one of the requirements of life, water is another which does limit where on the planet there is abundant life, and then the real problem lies with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere continuing to be removed from being available for life to use. Instead every day of the 3.5 billion years that carbon-based life has been on the planet, carbon se...

      I am not trying to start a new religion, or put down one set of people in favor of another, or even try and justify the terrible things that mankind has done both to mankind and the planet! Personally, I believe that most people on the planet are good and willing to help each other. Mass shootings seem to completely break down the fight or flight response, giving the shooter ample time to kill many! Very seldom do you hear of people swarming the shooter, with anything and everybody at hand, your chances of survival go greatly up when this happens, both by confusing the shooter and getting help to those injured much quicker. Even the police outside, for some reason, are hesitant to confront the shooter, so hoping to be rescued while hiding from someone with a gun is not a good option. Nor is arming people with guns a viable option, unless they are to be required to go through a gun handling class. Even then 1 against 1 is a crap shoot, 20 against 1 is not so much. Be...

       I am many things, but being computer knowledgeable is not one of them. I can look up information given enough time, but I learn by doing, not by reading about something. Sometime back I discovered two sites on the internet, Medium, and Quora. They are sites where many things are discussed and I thought, great here are two sites that seem to be what I need to start that ALL-IMPORTANT BEGINING CONVERSATION of seeing how life on any planet works in a new way. Both sites had an awful lot of drivel and ignorance on them both, but they also were about asking questions. Seemingly willing to at least look at other options, alas when it comes to Global Warming and Climate Change, it is all about mankind being simply a virus on the planet. If we do not completely change how we have treated the planet, we must go the way of the dodo bird and let the planet fix herself! Both sites will not allow my posts to be seen, nor will either site's moderators engage me, or better y...

       The "plan" does exactly that, by replanting the arid and semi-arid areas of the planet, which will reduce the level of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere to the levels that scientists believe will stop Global Warming and Climate Change. Plus reduce extreme temperatures and therefore extreme weather! Trying to replant so much of the planet will completely fail, without the infrastructure to bring fresh water to those areas! There is simply no way to increase plant life enough in areas that receive enough rainfall to maintain them, and still, reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere enough!     What will the plan accomplish? It will 1) Stop almost all of the pollution that mankind deposits in the seas and oceans! 2) It will reduce the hunger that too little fresh water brings. 3) It will prevent flooding by the creation of holding ponds around the planet so that when excess rainfall occurs these waters are safely channeled away. 4) Bringing water to dry a...

      That question does seem to follow if we think of evolution as not being driven by any outside force other than what makes life more likely to continue? But what if it is slightly more than that, what if, as gases in the atmosphere change, pressure is put on for specific adaptations to become necessary for life to continue. Far in the past, some scientists feel that air-borne bacteria became so prevalent that they ended up blocking enough of the sunlight to force the planet into a glaciation phase. Yet, at the same time, they used carbon from the floor of the great oceans, allowing the bacteria to become so numerous bringing this partially trapped carbon back into the atmosphere which should have warmed up the planet not cooled it down. Was this one of the planet's experiments on extending carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by speeding up part of the carbon cycle to do that, yet with negative results?       I have wondered if the Beaver and how...

These are not just two "Earths" there were many, but separated by a million different things that had to happen for mankind to be able to both, be here, and survive on this Earth that we are just coming to understand a small part of! Extinction events have been quite common on this planet, Many times wiping out 80% of what was on the planet. Sometimes affecting the whole planet, sometimes just what's on the land. The Great Oxygenation Event, took perhaps 300,000,000 years to truly change over 90% of the life on the planet. Can we consider that an extinction event or an adaptation event? Right now I am talking to several people via the internet, that are so positive that the planet has reached a point that we can not come back from. Yet tell me I do not understand anything. That we and the planet are either doomed or facing massive living changes in the near future, and nothing that I explain to them could possibly be right, yet they respond so quickly to me emailing them ...